Join the Oncology
Community
Follow Us:  

Patient & Survivor Care

MRI Identifies Candidates for Prostate Cancer Surveillance

By: PATRICE WENDLING,  Oncology Report Digital Network

CHICAGO – Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging trumped national guidelines in correctly classifying patients with prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance in a retrospective study of 126 men.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines misclassified 22 of the 126 patients, compared with 12 using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI).

Courtesy Dr. Baris Turkbey


The following images represent a 62-year-old patient with a serum PSA of 3.5ng/dL. Axial T2W MR image (a) shows a hypointense lesion in the right mid peripheral zone (arrow) with slight bulge posteriorly suggesting a possible extracapsular extension; ADC map of DW MRI (b) shows restricted diffusion within the lesion (arrow); the quantitative map (c) obtained from DCE MRI demonstrates early and fast enhancement within the lesion (arrow) as well as MR spectroscopy (d) demonstrates increased choline/citrate ratio within the lesion (white asterisk). The patient underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy and a Gleason 4+4 tumor with extracapsular extension was found in the right peripheral zone at histopathology.

 

When MP-MRI was added to the NCCN criteria, only 5 patients were misclassified, Dr. Baris Turkbey reported in an award-winning paper at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America.

"Presently, MRI is not in any urology guideline, but we want to change this," he said. "Our future goal is to create an NCI [National Cancer Institute] prostate cancer nomogram that includes multiparametric MRI, and our scientists are close to finishing it."

Dr. Turkbey, a fellow in the division of cancer treatment and diagnosis at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., and his colleagues evaluated 126 men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent 3T MP-MRI of the prostate and subsequent radical prostatectomy at a median of 48 days. Their mean age was 59 years and mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level 6.67 ng/mL.

MP-MRI images were obtained of the largest and most aggressive lesion using T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Each dominant lesion was then assigned an MP-MRI score of low (at least two positive sequences), moderate (three positive sequences), or high (four positive sequences).

Patients were eligible for active surveillance on MP-MRI if they had a dominant tumor of less than 0.5 cm3 without extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion and a low imaging score. The NCCN criteria for active surveillance are T1c disease, Gleason score of 6 or less, fewer than three positive biopsy cores, PSA less than 10 ng/mL, and PSA density less than 0.15 ng/mL/g.

Based on histopathological findings, 14 of 126 patents were eligible for active surveillance, with the remaining 112 candidates for active whole gland treatment.

NCCN guidelines wrongly classified 5 of 14 active surveillance patients and 17 of the 112 active treatment patients, whereas MP-MRI wrongly classified 1 active surveillance and 11 active treatment patients, Dr. Turkbey said.

The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the NCCN guidelines were 64%, 35%, and 83%, respectively (P = .00002), compared with 93%, 54%, and 91% with MP-MRI (P less than .000001).

12/09/11  

FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA

Bookmark and Share


Submitting your vote...
Not rated yet. Be the first who rates this item!
Click the rating bar to rate this item.

Vitals

Major Finding: The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the NCCN guidelines were 64%, 35%, and 83% (P = .00002), compared with 93%, 54%, and 91% with MP-MRI (P less than .000001).

Data Source: Retrospective analysis of 126 patients with prostate cancer.

Disclosures: Dr. Turkbey reported no conflicts of interest. A coauthor reported serving as a researcher for Koninklijke Philips Electronics, General Electric, Siemens, Hoffman-La Roche, and iCAD.

Current Issue


The Oncology Report Comprehensive reports and expert commentary on the latest advances in cancer treatment from the world's major oncology meetings.

Past issues, click here »


calendar
Jun 1 - 5
Chicago, IL
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): Annual Meeting
Jun 14 - 17
Amsterdam,
European Hematology Association (EHA): Annual Congress
Jun 18 - 21
Lake Tahoe, NV
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Pancreatic Cancer: Progress and Challenges
Jun 20 - 22
Milan,
European Institute of Oncology (IEO): 14th Milan Breast Cancer Conference
Jun 25 - 26
London,
Teenage Cancer Trust (TCT): International Conference
Jun 27 - 30
Barcelona,
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Conference: World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer
Jun 27 - 30
Boston, MA
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Chemical Systems Biology
Jun 28 - 30
New York, NY
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/ International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO): International Symposium
Jun 28 - 29
Paris,
WIN 2012 Symposium
Jul 7 - 10
Barcelona,
22nd Biennial Congress of the European Association for Cancer Research
More Calendar »