By: SHARON WORCESTER, Oncology Report Digital Network |
Major Finding: The 5-year overall-survival rate was 36% for 2,666 non-BRCA carriers, 44% for 909 BRCA1 carriers, and 52% for 304 BRCA2 carriers.
Data Source: A pooled analysis of 26 observational studies.
Disclosures: Numerous funding sources and author disclosures were reported. The complete list is available with the full text of the article at www.jama.com.
View on the News
Rethinking Ovarian Cancer Research
Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 – and particularly those in BRCA2 – are associated with higher 5-year overall survival rates among patients with confirmed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, according to a pooled analysis of data from 26 observational studies involving nearly 3,900 women.
The 5-year overall-survival rate was 36% for 2,666 non-BRCA carriers, 44% for 909 BRCA1 carriers, and 52% for 304 BRCA2 carriers, Kelly L. Bolton, Ph.D., of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md., and her colleagues reported on behalf of EMBRACE, KConFab Investigators, and the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network.
The findings are reported in the Jan. 25 issue of JAMA.
After adjustment for study and year of diagnosis, BRCA1 carriers were significantly more like to survive than were noncarriers (hazard ratio, 0.78), and their advantage improved slightly after additional adjustment for stage, grade, histology, and age at diagnosis (HR, 0.73), the investigators said (JAMA 2012;307:382-90).
BRCA2 carriers had an even greater advantage when compared with noncarriers (HR, 0.61), particularly after adjustment for other prognostic factors (HR, 0.49). The differences between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were statistically significant.
Although prior smaller studies have also demonstrated survival advantages among invasive epithelial ovarian cancer patients with BRCA2, with some also showing an advantage for those with BRCA1, the current study is the largest to date to assess survival in patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer based on BRCA1/2 carrier status.
The studies used in the analysis were reported as 10 from the United States, 6 from Europe, 2 from Israel, 1 each from Hong Kong, Canada, and Australia, and 5 from the United Kingdom. Participants were enrolled between 1987 and 2010 and were actively followed for a mean of 38 months.
Several significant differences were seen in regard to clinical features of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers compared with noncarriers. For example, tumors in carriers were more likely to be of serous histology and less likely to be of mucinous histology, and carriers were more likely to have stage III/IV tumors and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumors, compared with noncarriers. BRCA2 carriers were more likely than were BRCA1 carriers to have stage III/IV tumors. Also, BRCA1 carriers were younger at diagnosis than noncarriers, and BRCA2 carriers were slightly older.
The investigators also found that the survival advantage of BRCA1/2 carriers, compared with noncarriers, was attenuated in women who had a family history of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, or both.
"The improved survival or BRCA1/2 carriers relative to noncarriers, and the survival advantage of BRCA2 carriers relative to BRCA1 carriers, could be related to intrinsic biological differences, their response to therapeutic agents, or both," the investigators said, noting that in addition to differences in stage, grade, and histology, BRCA1/2 carriers could have differences in other aspects of tumor biology that were not measured in this study.
Although the study is limited by factors associated with the study design such as a heterogeneous population, the sample size and the magnitude of the differences observed between carriers and noncarriers are a testament to the robustness of the findings, they said.
View on the News
Rethinking Ovarian Cancer Research
The findings of this study provide "the latest evidence that ovarian cancer is a much more genetically and biologically heterogeneous disease than previously appreciated," Dr. David M. Hyman and Dr. David R. Spriggs wrote in an accompanying editorial.
The paper –"by far, the largest study of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer outcomes reported to date" – has important implications for the future of ovarian cancer research and treatment, they said:
"Phase [III] studies that do not stratify by BRCA mutation status or account for this factor in a preplanned statistical analysis risk possible confounding because approximately 15% of unselected patients with serous ovarian cancer will carry germline BRCA1/2 mutations."
The findings also provide impetus for rethinking the current approach to the development of targeted agents in molecularly defined subsets of ovarian cancer, according to the editorial (JAMA 2012;307:408-10). Trials of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which block base excision repair, have shown promise in BRCA-associated and sporadic ovarian cancers. Investigators should consider whether the unknown mechanisms underpinning the differences in survival of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancers, as demonstrated in this study, "may also result in differential sensitivity to agents that target the resultant homologous recombination defects."
"In the future, even germline BRCA status may not be sufficient to fully subclassify ovarian cancers and select the best treatment," said Dr. Hyman and Dr. Spriggs.
Additional study, in similarly large data sets, is needed to improve the understanding of the effects of somatic and epigenetic alterations in BRCA gene function and the complex interactions with other inherited alleles, they added, concluding that "the accelerating availability of detailed somatic and germline genetic information will challenge all physicians who stand at the bedside of patients with cancer and struggle to deliver compassionate, individualized care."
Dr. Hyman and Dr. Spriggs are with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Cornell University, both in New York. Neither had disclosures to report.
The Oncology Report
Comprehensive reports and expert commentary
on the latest advances in cancer treatment from
the world's major oncology meetings.
Past issues, click here »
| Jun 1 - 5 Chicago, IL | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): Annual Meeting |
| Jun 14 - 17 Amsterdam, | European Hematology Association (EHA): Annual Congress |
| Jun 18 - 21 Lake Tahoe, NV | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Pancreatic Cancer: Progress and Challenges |
| Jun 20 - 22 Milan, | European Institute of Oncology (IEO): 14th Milan Breast Cancer Conference |
| Jun 25 - 26 London, | Teenage Cancer Trust (TCT): International Conference |
| Jun 27 - 30 Barcelona, | European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Conference: World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer |
| Jun 27 - 30 Boston, MA | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Chemical Systems Biology |
| Jun 28 - 30 New York, NY | Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/ International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO): International Symposium |
| Jun 28 - 29 Paris, | WIN 2012 Symposium |
| Jul 7 - 10 Barcelona, | 22nd Biennial Congress of the European Association for Cancer Research |